Zeiss V6 vs NF NXS for hunting rifle

tlsmith22

Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 9, 2008
508
94
34
47
ALABAMA
Does anyone have both scopes to compare? I have 1 Zeiss Conquest and several NXS and one ATACR. Personally I think the Zeiss glass is better than the NF and you can basically see thru it at dark, its a crazy good lowlight scope. That being said, the NF is a tank and tracks perfect and I never worry abt them on heavy recoiling guns(300wm and RUM). I have a lighter weight hunting rifle that I want a scope with adjustable turrets on and I am trying to keep the weight down. The 3-18x50 V6 seems like it would be the perfect scope except I haven’t seen anyone compare it to a NF. I have a spare 2.5-10x42 NF and i debated on it but I would really like a little more magnification. Any reviews on the V6?
 

beretta_man11

Sergeant
Belligerents
Feb 17, 2010
656
73
34
34
MS
I currently have a 5-30v6 with exposed turrets on a 257. I've owned several NXS, and one 5-25atacr. Glass wise, I'd say the v6 is a little better than the atacr, and much better than the nxs. However- if weight isn't a concern, I'd trust the atacr over the v6 any day. I haven't had an issue with the v6, it just doesn't have the NF feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadow knows

roamin

Private
Belligerents
Jun 11, 2017
328
148
49
I'd take a VX6HD over a Conquest or an NXS compact any day. The glass on my VX6 absolutely shreds my NXS 2.5-10x42 and it's not even close it's a flat out beat down and I've looked thru the Conquest on a few occasions and didn't find anything that made me want one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duffman1975

Novak77

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Sep 16, 2018
303
104
49
I've ran Zeiss on my hunting rifles for years. Bought a conquest and sent it back. The NXS is a bad ass scope but the high end Zeiss stuff (IMO) is on a whole different level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadow knows

tlsmith22

Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 9, 2008
508
94
34
47
ALABAMA
I took 3 Nightforce scopes out, ATACR, NX8, and an NXS, set them all to 8 power and watched a group of doe and a small buck this evening right at dark. The deer were right at 300 yards. Then I got my Zeiss Conquest scope and my Swaro SLC binos out and looked at the same deer. It was a world of difference. The old conquest was even better than the ATACR. If the V6 is even better glass, its the one I feel like i need to go with. BTW, I love NF scopes and feel nothing compares in toughness.
 

Roo_man

Registered from Australia
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 5, 2018
110
43
34
SYD
I have a Zeiss and the quality and durability is second to none.
 

Shadow knows

Private
Belligerents
Aug 12, 2017
241
117
49
SD
I am on my 2nd Zeiss for hunting. I would own a lot more but I am a mil guy, Zeiss is moa. I can understand the Atacr comment on it being solid because they are. I have not had issues with my zeiss’s either.
My vote Zeiss.
 

Graywolf.260

rocket surgeon
Belligerents
Jun 1, 2010
403
69
34
western MT
I have a couple Zeiss Victory HT scopes on hunting rifles, 2.5-10 and 3-12. They have exposed mil turrets that are solid. The HT glass is supposed to be 95% transmission, don't know but the 3-12 glass seems to be identical to 3-12 Hensoldt side by side
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZG47A

Duffman1975

Private
Belligerents
Apr 6, 2017
98
26
24
Idaho
Honestly, i would go with Leupold VX-5HD or VX-6HD for a hunting scope over either of those. The glass is comparable with all the top tier scopes, but outperforms them in low light and glare situations.

here is a video comparison between the VX-5HD and a Swarovski Z5.

 

magtech

Ole one eye
Belligerents
Feb 22, 2013
94
29
24
Unless someone can have some negatives in a review, then its not a complete review. Its an advertisement.

Although, I do enjoy how they relate money to beer. Now we're talking about an investment.
 

tlsmith22

Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 9, 2008
508
94
34
47
ALABAMA
I went with a Zeiss V6. I did one of the red hawk demos so I got it below cost. If I don’t like it, I will sell it and get a NF. I just don’t think the NF can compare to Zeiss in glass but I’m certain it beats it everywhere else. I will post a review on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mav007

tlsmith22

Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 9, 2008
508
94
34
47
ALABAMA
Got to put the V6 thru its paces this weekend. Absolutely money well spent. Idk how Zeiss makes their glass so bright but its the brightest glass I have used. Tracked perfect and is lightweight with great glass. I still give th nod to NF on turret feel, but to me they beat everyone there.
 

5RWill

Optics Fiend
Belligerents
Oct 15, 2009
4,587
864
219
28
Mississippi
Between the two i'd go Zeiss just for the light weight. I think the NXS is overpriced for what it is this day in age less something has changed. We did have have issues with ours holding zero but it's been fine since it got back from Zeiss.

Having used a MK5 and hearing ravings about the VX6HD i'd call the custom shop and have one made in Mil. I don't care for MOA optics and i don't think we can get the European version of the V6 here in the states. I think the glass is good but was still behind my MK5 and doesn't really hold a candle to either of my Kahles. Though given the price difference it shouldn't. It's a solid optic though and for lightweight outside of Leupold or Swaro you're pretty much limited to those two.

I just want some SFP mil based hunting scopes damnit.
 

Iron Worker

Sergeant
Belligerents
Apr 10, 2005
377
15
22
61
Nevada
I have two Zeiss V6's(5-30x50mm) that I bought at Red hawk rifles . With my 61 year old corrected vision eyes ,Montana prairie dogs didn't like these two scopes so thumbs up. I had a Leupold VX6 3-18x50mm its glass was inferior to Zeiss,but I didn't have the HD version. Regardless I do regret selling the Leopold.
 

6point5CM

Jedi
Belligerents
Feb 16, 2017
143
16
22
35
Seattle / Montana
I'd take a VX6HD over a Conquest or an NXS compact any day. The glass on my VX6 absolutely shreds my NXS 2.5-10x42 and it's not even close it's a flat out beat down and I've looked thru the Conquest on a few occasions and didn't find anything that made me want one.
He's not talking about the old Conquest, but the new V6. The Leupold VX6HD is the closest competitor. I prefer the reticle and turrets of the Conquest V6 over the Leupold VX6HD. As you mentioned any NXS isn't even close. I think either of these are what you should try to get your hands on. If you need lots of elevation, the Conquest V6 3-18x50 is the only option with over 110 MOA. At 22oz and awesome turrets it's what I run for lightweight long range scopes. Either of these scopes allow you to observe before and after legal shooting light, so no issues in hunting scenarios.
 

Shadow knows

Private
Belligerents
Aug 12, 2017
241
117
49
SD
Got to put the V6 thru its paces this weekend. Absolutely money well spent. Idk how Zeiss makes their glass so bright but its the brightest glass I have used. Tracked perfect and is lightweight with great glass. I still give th nod to NF on turret feel, but to me they beat everyone there.
Agree 100%
 

roamin

Private
Belligerents
Jun 11, 2017
328
148
49
He's not talking about the old Conquest, but the new V6. The Leupold VX6HD is the closest competitor. I prefer the reticle and turrets of the Conquest V6 over the Leupold VX6HD. As you mentioned any NXS isn't even close. I think either of these are what you should try to get your hands on. If you need lots of elevation, the Conquest V6 3-18x50 is the only option with over 110 MOA. At 22oz and awesome turrets it's what I run for lightweight long range scopes. Either of these scopes allow you to observe before and after legal shooting light, so no issues in hunting scenarios.
I'm talking about the V6 as well.
 

XTREM HTR16

Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 19, 2011
1,170
144
169
Carmel, IN
Tagging in as I’m interested in the V6. Would love to see a long term tracking report on the Zeiss turrets. If they are as accurately repeatable as the NF, that would be great.
 

wapiti16b

Sergeant
Belligerents
Mar 16, 2014
531
52
34
New Mexico
What ^ he said ! , seems like the perfect choice for a hunting scope at a good price point but only if it tracks true and is repeatable!
 

tlsmith22

Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 9, 2008
508
94
34
47
ALABAMA
Yea I completely agree. I did a tracking test and it was spot on but obviously it was just that one test that day. Since then i have dialed for 400 yards to load test twice and everything appeared to be correct. This is only 400 yards though. I did the tracking test at 20 MOA up and down.