Which .22 carry pistol actually works reliable?

Jayjay1

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Oct 30, 2018
171
53
34
Hey guys,
another shooter wants to buy my 41 Smiff.

Not really thought about trading it, but now there is this offer, so I was circling around it.

Would maybe sell it to get a more carriable .22, just for plinking and maybe to put a dot on or not.
But then I realized, that I know not one .22 carry pistol which runs without issues.

Do you guys know one?
 

ddavis

Sergeant
Belligerents
May 26, 2011
1,000
60
154
Texas
I've had great luck with a Ruger 22/45, which has a really low failure rate, but like most .22's I've used they can't seem to make consistently reliable mags and you are really limited by ammo. You just never know if the priming compound is where it needs to be in the rim. I love mine for plinking and small game hunting though. It wears a Sparrow and a RMR. Easy to shoot out to 50 yards. Nice to have to thin out the loud barking squirrels from the gene pool when I'm hunting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vodoun daVinci

rth1800

Member
Belligerents
Sep 16, 2009
5,549
1,410
219
Not sure of your definition of “carry pistol” but I have zero issues with my first model Colt Woodsman’s. I also carry a little tip barrel Beretta called I think, Bobcat.
No issues with it either.
 
Last edited:

45cal4life

It's a secret
Belligerents
Jan 20, 2005
206
61
34
Arkansas
***Bias alert, I'm a 1911 guy*** Have a Rock Island Arms/Armscor XT22 (complete pistol) that I've got dialed in pretty good with CCI Tactical. A lot of polishing with a dermal, filing down the firing pin, cutting/shortening the firing pin spring, very slight filling on the extractor and ejector then added a Dawson front fiber optic sight. Not the worlds fastest pistol but sure is fun, less expensive to shoot than 45acp, no brass to pickup and no time invested in reloading. There's a lot of conversions, even for the Glock guys
 

straightshooter1

Private
Belligerents
Minuteman
Dec 5, 2017
377
159
49
AZ
Hey guys,
another shooter wants to buy my 41 Smiff.

Not really thought about trading it, but now there is this offer, so I was circling around it.

Would maybe sell it to get a more carriable .22, just for plinking and maybe to put a dot on or not.
But then I realized, that I know not one .22 carry pistol which runs without issues.

Do you guys know one?
Ruger SR-22
 

Jayjay1

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Oct 30, 2018
171
53
34
When I was in the market for the Smiff some years ago, the M&P 22 and the Ruger SR22 were both called not-reliable.

I was close before buying the Ruger, but having heard or read a lot of F-T-F problems and switched over to the Smiff.
Did they change anything with those two, so that they run with no issues now?

And don´t get me wrong with the Smiff is a great shooter, but veeery heavy and a bit bulky too.
 

straightshooter1

Private
Belligerents
Minuteman
Dec 5, 2017
377
159
49
AZ
When I was in the market for the Smiff some years ago, the M&P 22 and the Ruger SR22 were both called not-reliable.

I was close before buying the Ruger, but having heard or read a lot of F-T-F problems and switched over to the Smiff.
Did they change anything with those two, so that they run with no issues now?

And don´t get me wrong with the Smiff is a great shooter, but veeery heavy and a bit bulky too.
I've had my SR-22 for a few years now and haven't had any issues like F-T-F. The only issue I had with it is that the grip is a bit small for my large hands. A little mod addition to the bottom of the mag solved that. It's a light gun, easy to take apart to clean, it runs smooth and it's only been when running any of the Remington ammo through it where such problems happened. But, with Remington ammo, that'll happen with any gun. Over the few years I've had this SR-22 I've conversed with a couple other owners who expressed similar satisfaction.

I originally got it for my wife, who needed something light and reliable to shoot. It worked out pretty well for her, except she lost interest in shooting and doesn't shoot if much any more. So, I play with it every so often along with my Mark III.
 

Jayjay1

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Oct 30, 2018
171
53
34
Suppressed any pistol would work more reliable I suppose, won´t they?

Well, suppresors are here a no-no, unfortunately.
 

Gunfighter14e2

Rusty Nail
Belligerents
Jul 9, 2002
4,684
4,593
219
Alabama
eHam.net
Suppressed any pistol would work more reliable I suppose, won´t they?
Just the opposite, cans dirty a pistol up quick. I've cleaned the M&P 3 times in 7500rds. Remember some reviewers are paid to give bad reviews, then you have those who know nothing about the items they are reviewing in the first place. I don't trust any review unless I know the person or group I'm reading it from.
 

sako17

Banhammer
Banned !
Minuteman
Jan 1, 2019
209
202
49
Ruger now sells an lcr 22 magnum. I have both the lcr 22 and 38. Great guns. I am very satisfied.
 

billmeek

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Jan 26, 2019
328
133
49
Middle TN
My suggestion? Keep the 41 and go buy a Taurus TX22 as a plinker. You can find them reasonably priced right now along with a $50 mail-in rebate:


The TX22 is a striker fired 22LR with a good factory trigger with a short reset. I just got one in and it's better than any other stock 22LR pistol trigger I've tried. The magazines, which it comes with 2, hold 16 rounds. Take down for cleaning is extremely simple. I haven't had time to take it to the range yet, but all reviews say they are accurate. The biggest gripes I've read in the reviews is that the tabs on the side of the mags are hard to use. The pistol (now) ships with a mag loader to ease loading. The other is that adjustment on the rear site might not be enough vertically so you have to adjust your aim. If decide to put a red dot on it, that wouldn't be an issue. An adapter plate can be bought for the TX22 at:

 

Jayjay1

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Oct 30, 2018
171
53
34
Well, that are all neat looking pistols.

But with the .22, maybe Hellbender has spoken some truth.

Actually it was the same, some years ago, when I was in the market for a carry .22 and came out with the Smiff, just because I couldn´t find a .22 pistol which was reclaimed as absolutely reliable.
:unsure:
 

Winchester59

Full Member
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Nov 9, 2013
299
44
34
Missouri
I have several .22 pistols, of which the CZ Kadet is my favorite for plinking etc., but if I'm going to carry one it is always the S/W 43C Air Frame revolver. It fits in the same Bullard holster as my S/W 340, very light and comfortable, no jams or misfires and very accurate (with practice).
 

rth1800

Member
Belligerents
Sep 16, 2009
5,549
1,410
219
This will be an unpopular position.

I think too much emphasis is placed on "100% reliability." No mechanical device is 100% reliable. I have had many revolvers get stoppages. Mostly due to heat and build up of carbon and powder residue. Happened recently on a Smith 22 mag. It is a very tight, hand fit gun. It only took a box or two of ammo and the cylinder would not turn due to the barrel/cylinder fit. It is a very early gun and was unfired. Even with a well maintained weapon, stuff happens. You can get debris in the barrel cylender interface, a bullet can slip forward from the case and stop cylinder rotation, internal parts breakage etc.

I can clear a semi auto in no time. You would hardly notice I had a dud round. I'm not sure what ammo you guys are having issues with not firing but the ammo I shoot it is not one round in 500 that is a dud. Possibly less than one in 1000. Not enough to make me choose another handgun. I have been shooting pistols and revolvers for over 50 years. For me, clearing a pistol is much faster than clearing a revolver. I would say stoppages are about equal between the two.
 

Snuby642

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Feb 11, 2017
1,846
1,573
119
Most reliable, ruger single six.
Have had the same one for 40 years.
Always first handgun I use for a new shooter. Can use the mag cylinder if you need too.

Have never had a failure other than some dud ammo.

Camp gun yes indispensable.
Daily carry not so much.
But was used once to disarm a hippie with a knife once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fig

garandman

Gonna Try Sumpthin' new, Here
Belligerents
Nov 17, 2009
2,408
233
169
Seated, presently
I don't believe I would consider any 22 rim fire reliable enough for a carry gun.

You have to consider not only the gun but also the possibility of dud ammo.
 

rth1800

Member
Belligerents
Sep 16, 2009
5,549
1,410
219
I knew a man very well who carried a Colt Woodsman in the Pacific in WW11. USMC and made several of the islands. He said he would carry a lot of ammo as well as 8 loaded magazines.
 

rth1800

Member
Belligerents
Sep 16, 2009
5,549
1,410
219
PMR30 is amazing. Light, powerful and reasonably accurate. Only downside to me is the size. It is equal to a full sized 1911. Empty it weighs 19 oz IIRC. I really liked mine. Not sure why I sold it. Groups were 4" at 25 yards. Shot right on the sights and never malfunctioned.
 

TOP PREDATOR

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Jul 19, 2008
4,613
51
154
48
SCRANTON AREA PENNSYLVANIA
Ok OP so i’m Thinking you're talking about an all around plinking pistol that can basically be carried for self defense too, and snakes and such.

I wouldn’t go with one for self defense as the primary mission, but if I did it would be a snub by revolver in 22lr or mag. S&W has a few nice ones in a J frame configuration, ruger the LCR, even Taurus and Rossi have a few .22lr snubbies our to 3”.

The S&W are pricey, but you get S&W quality in a J frame that transfers over to many available holsters, accessories, etc. plus is a nice way to practice if you have a Jframe in center fire.

Rugers are nice, medium priced, good quality. Same as above with holsters and such.

Taurus revolvers aren’t bad and are economical as are Rossi.

Overall if you’re selling your 41, you should have more than enough $ for a S&W j frame of an “heirloom” quality and holster options. Their 22mag capacity is 1 more over the ruger, their 22lr the same.

Being the same dimensions as their bigger cousins, when you want to conceal carry for the sole purpose of self defense you can use the same carry holsters.

BUT if you’re saying “carry” as having the .22 as a dedicated carry gun.....it’s better than nothing I guess but there are a whole lot better options out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winchester59

JaoeyP

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 28, 2018
176
68
34
When I was in the market for the Smiff some years ago, the M&P 22 and the Ruger SR22 were both called not-reliable.

I was close before buying the Ruger, but having heard or read a lot of F-T-F problems and switched over to the Smiff.
Did they change anything with those two, so that they run with no issues now?

And don´t get me wrong with the Smiff is a great shooter, but veeery heavy and a bit bulky too.
Any given semi auto 22lr pistol can be finicky. The way this was overcome for years was to recommend high velocity ammo. Then we had a dry spell on 22 ammo, and guns that hadn't changed were deamed unreliable because they wouldn't feed every single ammo you put through them, but you couldn't find a different ammo to try.

All that said, check out a Walther P22QD or P22Q. Walther reworked their spring tension and slide weight in 2017. Made them much less ammo picky. Good little guns for the money.
 

Quarter Horse

Sergeant
Belligerents
Apr 17, 2010
950
170
49
72
Astoria, Or.
I think almost any change you would make for the 41 would be going backwards. This would be doubly true if your 41 is an older model with the cocking indicator. The bulk of a 41 is due to the grips. Find a set of beat up grips and slim them down. The weight is a function of the barrel. S&W offered a "Sport" or "Field" barrel. It was a five inch barrel greatly slimmed down. When I had my 41 I came by a five and a half inch heavy barrel orphan. I had my 'smith cut it back to five and reprofile it to remove much of the weight. It made a very handy package. I would not recommend a 41 as a defense gun. Not just because it's a .22 but also the factory the trigger is way to light.

I of course didn't follow the advice I am giving you. The 41 with two barrels and a Bianchi field holster went down the road decades ago. I replaced the 41 with a S&W 63. The 63 is the first iteration of the .22/.32 Kit Gun in stainless. Mine is a no dash gun in four inch so it has no ejector rod housing or underlug barrel. Small, relatively light and completely reliable it has seen a lot of field time. If you happen to have a K frame gun in another caliber the 617 Hoser recommended would be a great selection.

Here's one more thought regarding the J an K frame Smith .22s. There are plenty of earlier, blued steel, .22s around. They show remarkable care in their manufacture and if you hunt around around you can find some very high condition guns that are quite old and ocaisonally an example that is an absolute steal.