Nice breakdown of the outrageous nature of politics. (I did not write this)

Apr 26, 2013
1,550
730
113
#1
Here's what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important......

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

A Grand Jury had been empanelled.

Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?

Bet you can’t guess.

None other than James Comey.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?

Your friend and mine, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?

I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, but it was Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009......

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.

The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Ok, no big deal right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this time frame?

Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland?

No other than, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?

~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

No other than, Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email. ( Let's not forget at least 10 CIA spies in china were killed by the Chinese because of the leaks and god knows what else occurred)

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer?

No other than James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her.

Nope.... couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage..... pick a crime, any crime, chances are...... this group and a few others did it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clinton's.

They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey's brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

And,
See the person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.


WHO IS LISA BARSOOMIAN?

Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background.

Lisa H. Barsoomian, a US Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protege of James Comey and Robert Mueller.

Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.

Lawrence also represented:

Robert Mueller three times;

James Comey five times;

Barack Obama 45 times;

Kathleen Sebelius 56 times;

Bill Clinton 40 times; and

Hillary Clinton 17 times.

Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.

You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the

work history of this Barsoomian woman?

Apparently someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?).

Someone out there cares so much that the internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.

Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. And, although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health.

This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities.

It’s a cover, so big deal right? I mean what does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?

It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians.

Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention?


BECAUSE….

She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE….That’s why!!

GET THIS INFORMATION OUT TO EVERYONE YOU CAN.


Jaw dropping, shocking and extremely sad that this info has never been exposed-


DO YOUR PART IN PLASTERING THIS INFORMATION EVERYWHERE .... it’s bullet proof and cannot be blown off by leftists ... and will convince many not paying attention that we have a soft coup happening now..

GLP powers activate .... get this all over the net and email
Boxes
 

mijp5

Gunny Sergeant
May 7, 2009
4,316
1,333
113
#3
I don’t have the attention span to keep up with that convoluted mess, unlike these criminals. Justice is subjective
 

Nik H

Constantly Learning
Jan 22, 2014
3,417
1,125
113
Rhode Island
#4
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Can you imagine the state of this country if that cunt made it to be POTUS?

Is there any further speculation required to understand why they are going after Trump?

There will be much badness to come.
 
Apr 26, 2013
1,550
730
113
#5
I don’t have the attention span to keep up with that convoluted mess, unlike these criminals. Justice is subjective
Cliff-notes version of this cliff-notes version is:
Comey and Mueller have been back-and-forthing directorship of the FBI and covering up for Hillary on the criminal front. Lois Lerner and Rod Rosenstein have been keeping her taxes off the radar and running interference when sketchy shit like 100+ million was donated to the foundation by people involved in Uranium 1, and when things got REALLY shitty, Rod's wife defended her (and everyone else) in court.
 

Namekagon

Online Training Member
Mar 22, 2018
74
51
18
Wausau, WI
#6
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Can you imagine the state of this country if that cunt made it to be POTUS?

Is there any further speculation required to understand why they are going after Trump?

There will be much badness to come.
If she had been elected, it would be like nothing happend. We wouldn't know any of this. We weren't supposed to know this much. Trump's election flicked a light on over the rats nest that they thought they could keep perpetually off. I voted for Donald Trump hoping he'd be a hand grenade under the door of Washington. I damn sure hope his voters stay with him, or he'll just be a flash bang.
 

deersniper

Online Training Member
Feb 22, 2007
2,102
495
83
N. Maryland
#7
And nothings going to happen

Shows how law abiding the right side is when Lois Lerner, Lon hourichi, etc are still walking around.

The founding father domestic terrorists would have been making big things happen along time ago.
 
Likes: ArmyJerry
May 27, 2014
661
289
63
32.752325 -79.867804
#20
I know in the military your orders are supposed to come from the top down, but how the fuck has some of the “baddest mother fuckers” we have not acted on the part about “protecting the constitution from all enemy’s foreign and domestic” There is a huge cast of characters that shouldn’t be sucking air any more.......we need to break out the “Batlight”.
 
May 8, 2013
178
26
28
Portland
#21
Here's what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important......

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

A Grand Jury had been empanelled.

Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?

Bet you can’t guess.

None other than James Comey.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?

Your friend and mine, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?

I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, but it was Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009......

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.

The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Ok, no big deal right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this time frame?

Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland?

No other than, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?

~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

No other than, Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email. ( Let's not forget at least 10 CIA spies in china were killed by the Chinese because of the leaks and god knows what else occurred)

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer?

No other than James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her.

Nope.... couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage..... pick a crime, any crime, chances are...... this group and a few others did it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clinton's.

They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey's brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

And,
See the person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.


WHO IS LISA BARSOOMIAN?

Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background.

Lisa H. Barsoomian, a US Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protege of James Comey and Robert Mueller.

Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.

Lawrence also represented:

Robert Mueller three times;

James Comey five times;

Barack Obama 45 times;

Kathleen Sebelius 56 times;

Bill Clinton 40 times; and

Hillary Clinton 17 times.

Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.

You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the

work history of this Barsoomian woman?

Apparently someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?).

Someone out there cares so much that the internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.

Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. And, although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health.

This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities.

It’s a cover, so big deal right? I mean what does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?

It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians.

Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention?


BECAUSE….

She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE….That’s why!!

GET THIS INFORMATION OUT TO EVERYONE YOU CAN.


Jaw dropping, shocking and extremely sad that this info has never been exposed-


DO YOUR PART IN PLASTERING THIS INFORMATION EVERYWHERE .... it’s bullet proof and cannot be blown off by leftists ... and will convince many not paying attention that we have a soft coup happening now..

GLP powers activate .... get this all over the net and email
Boxes
Link please
 

AviCado

My cans are just okay, really.
Jul 23, 2018
160
62
28
St Louis
#29
Actually he can, but he's got the power to pardon himself.
Not from state crimes, and not after he's been impeached. Of course that all depends on whether the Republicans grow a spine. If not I'm sure the "winner" in chief will continue declaring bankruptcy and blaming CNN for his repeated failures to understand his office, the functions of the government, and whining that it's not fair that he can't censor media he doesn't like.
 
Last edited:

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Nov 6, 2011
6,695
2,835
113
50
MA
#30
Ooh, chain letters. Do I get 7 years bad ouck if I don't send it to 3 friends in 24 hours?

Avicado,

I've asked everyone of your ilk just one question and never had an answer given.

I won't go into the convoluted mud of everything else that occurs around my one simple question, it's too confusing.

I try to keep it simple so there is a yes or no answer.

Here goes.........

Is it a felony for the Secretary of State to set up on an offline private server and conduct public business to include the transfer of classified information?

Just answer.

And if you have any knowledge of classified info you know that even the lowliest PFC that handles any documents with a classification has received extensive education regarding handling of classified material it would be expected that "the most well prepared" person in the world would surely know you don't set up an offline server. I'm not talking just occasional use of a Hotmail account but conduct of all business through a non approved server.

Answer the question.......
 

AviCado

My cans are just okay, really.
Jul 23, 2018
160
62
28
St Louis
#31
Avicado,

I've asked everyone of your ilk just one question and never had an answer given.

I won't go into the convoluted mud of everything else that occurs around my one simple question, it's too confusing.

I try to keep it simple so there is a yes or no answer.

Here goes.........

Is it a felony for the Secretary of State to set up on an offline private server and conduct public business to include the transfer of classified information?

Just answer.

And if you have any knowledge of classified info you know that even the lowliest PFC that handles any documents with a classification has received extensive education regarding handling of classified material it would be expected that "the most well prepared" person in the world would surely know you don't set up an offline server. I'm not talking just occasional use of a Hotmail account but conduct of all business through a non approved server.

Answer the question.......
Maybe. If it was done intentionally to circumvent the process of classification, sure. If not, then it would likely fall under the "unintentionally" portion, under which there have only been prosecutions when there was gross negligence at stake or further attempts to cover up the negligence.

It's not a yes or no question, too vague. Instead I'd recommend listening to a lawyer whi did the caselaw research talk about which laws apply:
https://openargs.com/oa13-hillary-clintons-damned-emails/

Anyone who says it's a simple yes or no is lying or uninformed.
 

ArmyJerry

Staff Sergeant
Nov 22, 2012
5,132
3,200
113
#32
Let me see here, he is a marine, he is unhinged, he has no problem abridging the constitution and the law to remove a duly elected president..... Is this you Robert Mueller?

Actually he can, but he's got the power to pardon himself.
Maybe. If it was done intentionally to circumvent the process of classification, sure. If not, then it would likely fall under the "unintentionally" portion, under which there have only been prosecutions when there was gross negligence at stake or further attempts to cover up the negligence.

It's not a yes or no question, too vague. Instead I'd recommend listening to a lawyer whi did the caselaw research talk about which laws apply:
https://openargs.com/oa13-hillary-clintons-damned-emails/

Anyone who says it's a simple yes or no is lying or uninformed.
 

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Nov 6, 2011
6,695
2,835
113
50
MA
#33
Maybe. If it was done intentionally to circumvent the process of classification, sure. If not, then it would likely fall under the "unintentionally" portion, under which there have only been prosecutions when there was gross negligence at stake or further attempts to cover up the negligence.

It's not a yes or no question, too vague. Instead I'd recommend listening to a lawyer whi did the caselaw research talk about which laws apply:
https://openargs.com/oa13-hillary-clintons-damned-emails/

Anyone who says it's a simple yes or no is lying or uninformed.
Can't be president from prison.
Now I know you are full of shit.

You support a two tiered justice system where some are untouchable.

If you have ever had the lowliest of jobs that ever might involve govt communications you have taken extensive classes informing you of the public information laws.

What she did was "gross negligence" except for one crooked FBI agent specifically avoiding that criminal definition.
 

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Nov 6, 2011
6,695
2,835
113
50
MA
#35
Maybe. If it was done intentionally to circumvent the process of classification, sure. If not, then it would likely fall under the "unintentionally" portion, under which there have only been prosecutions when there was gross negligence at stake or further attempts to cover up the negligence.

It's not a yes or no question, too vague. Instead I'd recommend listening to a lawyer whi did the caselaw research talk about which laws apply:
https://openargs.com/oa13-hillary-clintons-damned-emails/

Anyone who says it's a simple yes or no is lying or uninformed.

And except for when you are a Clinton there is never the requirement for "intent" when you are negligent.

Negligence by its nature never requires "intent" it is based on whether a reasonable person "knew or should have known".

So either Hillary is incompetent and unqualified to be a dog catcher or she she is a criminal.

I say both.
 

AviCado

My cans are just okay, really.
Jul 23, 2018
160
62
28
St Louis
#37
Now I know you are full of shit.

You support a two tiered justice system where some are untouchable.

If you have ever had the lowliest of jobs that ever might involve govt communications you have taken extensive classes informing you of the public information laws.

What she did was "gross negligence" except for one crooked FBI agent specifically avoiding that criminal definition.
What section of which law was broken? I can tell you exactly which would be considered, but if you can't then I'm going to presume that you're not actually familiar with the Espionage act, and are trying to apply the military orders on handling classified information. As you may or may not be aware, the laws that govern military and civilian laws.

Also it wasn't one person, Comey didn't personally write the entire memo. He would have had a team of lawyers review the case first. I don't want anyone to be untouchable, including the president, but when you have to make things up (or try to accuse other people of not knowing something, when i presume you aren't actually familiar with the law at hand) then it should indicate that you're barking up the wrong tree. Also Comey's words were to the effect that no prosecutor would bring a case based on the facts of that particular case, the intent being that the facts as presented in the report would not stand up to either scrutiny in court or in an appeals court, and lastly that the FBI might fear that an appeals court would even find the provision in question (not the entire Espionage Act, but parts of it) unconstitutional on the doctrine of vagueness.
Try discussing it without just repeating soundbites.
 
Likes: Fakedad

Maggot

Philo-Sophia Fidelis et veritas
Jul 27, 2007
7,057
1,071
113
Charlottesville, Virginia
#42
"Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? "

Guess who instigated a war in Iraq, and the company he was formerly CEO of, got a "No competition contract" to do all reconstruction?

'Yawn'

Politics as usual. Dirty from the top down. Dirty from the bottom up.
 

Namekagon

Online Training Member
Mar 22, 2018
74
51
18
Wausau, WI
#45
Maybe. If it was done intentionally to circumvent the process of classification, sure. If not, then it would likely fall under the "unintentionally" portion, under which there have only been prosecutions when there was gross negligence at stake or further attempts to cover up the negligence.

It's not a yes or no question, too vague. Instead I'd recommend listening to a lawyer whi did the caselaw research talk about which laws apply:
https://openargs.com/oa13-hillary-clintons-damned-emails/

Anyone who says it's a simple yes or no is lying or uninformed.

WHY did she need a private server?? She was a public employee. Why was it necessary for the Secretary of State to conduct state business on a non .gov server? One that she KNEW was being handled by a tiny company that lacked sophisticated security?

This is what drives me fricken bonkers. Her greatest sin lies in the "why." The WHY is, she had that PRIVATE server to avoid congressional scrutiny. I.E. hide things from our elected representatives, and the people. She had that private server so she could sell access to her "inevitable" presidency. The foundation should be renamed "The Bill and Hillary Slush Fund" into which Saudi princes dump millions of dollars in exchange for their flavor of foreign policy. THATS WHY SHE NEEDED THE SERVER! Thats why 30,000 emails are gone. Having the email server is small fucking potatoes compared to what she was doing with it. And if you think for a second that she isn't capable of that type of corruption, for fuck's sake she rigged YOUR DAMN PRIMARY to fuck her opponent.

And damn near half the country voted for her. Any honest democrat should be so embarrassed of their party, so embarrassed of how she behaved that THEY are the ones who should be ready to burn her at the stake. How can you defend her and sleep?

How anyone who has any respect for this country, our government, the people who died to preserve it, could defend that crooked bitch is beyond my comprehension. I hope the Clintons are the anchor that drags your entire party to bottom of a 40-year sea of Donald Trumps.
 

Namekagon

Online Training Member
Mar 22, 2018
74
51
18
Wausau, WI
#46
AviCado,

Is your moral compass so damaged by liberalism that you are willing to turn a blind eye to all her corruption, based on whether or not the email address she used to screw everyone was lawful?
 

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Nov 6, 2011
6,695
2,835
113
50
MA
#50
What section of which law was broken? I can tell you exactly which would be considered, but if you can't then I'm going to presume that you're not actually familiar with the Espionage act, and are trying to apply the military orders on handling classified information. As you may or may not be aware, the laws that govern military and civilian laws.

Also it wasn't one person, Comey didn't personally write the entire memo. He would have had a team of lawyers review the case first. I don't want anyone to be untouchable, including the president, but when you have to make things up (or try to accuse other people of not knowing something, when i presume you aren't actually familiar with the law at hand) then it should indicate that you're barking up the wrong tree. Also Comey's words were to the effect that no prosecutor would bring a case based on the facts of that particular case, the intent being that the facts as presented in the report would not stand up to either scrutiny in court or in an appeals court, and lastly that the FBI might fear that an appeals court would even find the provision in question (not the entire Espionage Act, but parts of it) unconstitutional on the doctrine of vagueness.
Try discussing it without just repeating soundbites.
The far right wing Huffington Post thinks she broke some laws...

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/d-c-rutledge/fbi-clinton-was-extremely_b_10818458.html

Politifact pulled a Comey instead of saying Pants on Fire. They basically convict her just like Comey did than failed to charge....

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...lary-clintons-email-did-she-follow-all-rules/




Avicado you are morally bankrupt if you can not say Yes to acknowledge that a government official conducting the peoples business via means that does not memorialize for record the communication is in violation.

Than to further compound the issue to transfer classified information through the unsecure system in violation of the law as she did and as the FBI grudgingly admitted is a crime and you deny that?

The fact you cant say YES shows you are incapable of honesty.

You are a shill, you are a liar, and you are an enemy of the rule of law and our Republic.

I would be able to find respect for you if you would be honest in stating that you disagree with the Country as established in the Constitution and it is your desire to change it to a Communist Utopia.

This lying just makes you look dumb.
 
Top Bottom