Lapping your rings

Skookum

Theory of Devolution
Belligerents
May 6, 2017
1,553
1,706
119
Your mom's
It depends. If you are using two piece bases, then absolutely. If you are using a straight pic rail on a straight action, and your rings are either line bored pairs or a one piece mount, then maybe not.
 

sgtsmmiii

Lieutenant
Belligerents
Sep 2, 2010
385
49
34
64
Lexington, KY
It depends. If you are using two piece bases, then absolutely. If you are using a straight pic rail on a straight action, and your rings are either line bored pairs or a one piece mount, then maybe not.
Kinda agree with Skookum. I hate ring marks on my scopes, so most times I will lightly lap the bottom rings even if they are going on a pic rail. I will lightly run a fine file around the edges of the top portion of the rings, again, just to keep from scratching the scope body. For a two piece base, I'd say "yes" - for quality rings going on a 1 piece rail - maybe not so much.
 

Threadcutter308

Outlier
Belligerents
Feb 13, 2017
4,489
6,105
119
Camano Island, Washington
There have been a lot of prior threads about this. Consensus is coming around to saying "no". I'm an old timer and come from the days of Leupold MK IV seperate rings and two piece bases. In those days, you lapped and it was generally necessary (because of sitting on R700 actions).
Nowdays, with modern CNC machining repeatability and one piece bases, it really doesn't seem to be necessary. I purchased a QD one piece mount from a very reputable manufacturer a couple of years ago. Popular opinion was that no, I didn't need to lap. I thought, OK, all the arguements against lapping seem credible, but I'm going to go ahead and lap, just to see what the fitment really is. After a short time lapping, I looked at the fitment and concluded that no, it really hadn't been necessary. But, I did it to satisfy my curiousity. I would be hard pressed to think about lapping the rings in a one piece mount. Individual rings and bases are a different matter though. What many people seem to lose track of is the possibility of mis-alingment (of two piece bases/rings) because of the action. Within reason, the only way to compensate for the mis-alignment is by lapping. I have standardized on Spuhr 4006 one piece mounts, have never lapped any of them and never will. The repeatability and consistency of modern CNC machining has gotten to the point where I just don't think it's necessary anymore (but, I had to prove it to myself)
 
  • Like
Reactions: JOrisman and Jeffd

SRSDriver

Sergeant
Belligerents
Aug 10, 2011
536
6
22
45
Northern CO
Most modern rings dont need to be lapped. There are discussions on here of manufacturers trying to get people to quit lapping rings, as it's not really necessary with modern CNC machines, and there is a good chance you will comprimise the ring
 
  • Like
Reactions: JOrisman

vh20

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Dec 2, 2012
1,751
532
219
54
Check with your manufacturer - some have warranties that are voided if you lap them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JOrisman

JOrisman

Private
Minuteman
Mar 9, 2018
37
4
12
Omaha, NE
There have been a lot of prior threads about this. Consensus is coming around to saying "no". I'm an old timer and come from the days of Leupold MK IV seperate rings and two piece bases. In those days, you lapped and it was generally necessary (because of sitting on R700 actions).
Nowdays, with modern CNC machining repeatability and one piece bases, it really doesn't seem to be necessary. I purchased a QD one piece mount from a very reputable manufacturer a couple of years ago. Popular opinion was that no, I didn't need to lap. I thought, OK, all the arguements against lapping seem credible, but I'm going to go ahead and lap, just to see what the fitment really is. After a short time lapping, I looked at the fitment and concluded that no, it really hadn't been necessary. But, I did it to satisfy my curiousity. I would be hard pressed to think about lapping the rings in a one piece mount. Individual rings and bases are a different matter though. What many people seem to lose track of is the possibility of mis-alingment (of two piece bases/rings) because of the action. Within reason, the only way to compensate for the mis-alignment is by lapping. I have standardized on Spuhr 4006 one piece mounts, have never lapped any of them and never will. The repeatability and consistency of modern CNC machining has gotten to the point where I just don't think it's necessary anymore (but, I had to prove it to myself)
Awesome man! Much appreciated
 

M77

Private
Belligerents
Oct 17, 2012
119
28
34
32
Australia
buy quality rings and stop wasting time . get out and shoot more rather then stroking alloy.
The whole Lapping mentality for me comes from the Benchrest / Fclass Crowd ,
Buy Spuhr , ARC, Nightforce , Seekins, Era-tac , Badger Etc and you wont have an issue .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender and Jeffd

kevinsachs

Kevin Sachs
Hessian
Belligerents
Minuteman
Feb 27, 2018
260
33
34
Minnesota
Lapping Talley Hunting rings makes sense but to lap NF or Badger rings is a bit OCD. Too each their own though.
 

magnumruger

Private
Minuteman
Feb 28, 2009
77
5
12
indiana
Always have ran Larue without issues...lots of guys here don't seem to like them tho. Buy higher end rings, have no problems and never look back.
 

mcameron

Old Salt
Belligerents
Nov 17, 2011
3,439
4,984
219
for what you are going to spend on a lapping kit.....you could have just bought better rings to begin with.....

in general......if you are spending $100 on rings....they dont need to be lapped.

mount good rings to a good rail and youll be all set.


i had a set of badgers that i lapped......only did enough to remove the finish, saw i was getting 90% contact......havent lapped a set of rings since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Threadcutter308

guns_not_groceries

Private
Belligerents
Mar 12, 2010
75
34
24
Kansas
Doesn’t matter how perfectly machined your rings are if they’re being bolted to pic rail that is being distorted by imperfect factory receiver scope mount threading. Four #6 screws can most definitely distort even a HD steel pic rail. There is a reason nearly every builder will blueprint a production receiver before they build on them.

Obviously if you’re properly bedding your rail, or working with a custom action, the above may not apply. But I would never generically say there’s no need to lap rings without considering the whole system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canepole

LawnMM

Harbinger of Sarcasm
Belligerents
Jul 5, 2009
1,942
433
189
Colorado
www.accuracy-tech.com
Doesn’t matter how perfectly machined your rings are if they’re being bolted to pic rail that is being distorted by imperfect factory receiver scope mount threading. Four #6 screws can most definitely distort even a HD steel pic rail. There is a reason nearly every builder will blueprint a production receiver before they build on them.

Obviously if you’re properly bedding your rail, or working with a custom action, the above may not apply. But I would never generically say there’s no need to lap rings without considering the whole system.
If that's the problem then spend the money and get your receiver trued up. Don't take a set of concentrically machines rings and lap them out of whack to match a poorly drilled receiver.

This is 2018 and lapping rings is retarded.
 

hereinaz

I have no idea why I get these new labels...
Hessian
Online Training Access
Belligerents
Minuteman
Mar 7, 2018
505
352
69
Arizona
If that's the problem then spend the money and get your receiver trued up. Don't take a set of concentrically machines rings and lap them out of whack to match a poorly drilled receiver.

This is 2018 and lapping rings is retarded.
Precision rifles and gear need no lapping.

If I have a cheap hunting rifle, I am starting to bed rings, because junk is gonna be out of square and out of true. Lapping is such a pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: guns_not_groceries

guns_not_groceries

Private
Belligerents
Mar 12, 2010
75
34
24
Kansas
If that's the problem then spend the money and get your receiver trued up. Don't take a set of concentrically machines rings and lap them out of whack to match a poorly drilled receiver.

This is 2018 and lapping rings is retarded.
How would you know if your receiver is a few thousands off? The potential issues rest in the unknowns, not the knowns.
 

whatsupdoc

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Dec 12, 2017
491
305
69
Long Island NY
If the rail is integral to the receiver then it should be good to go but if you are installing a rail on a 700 receiver trued or not it will never match perfectly.
 

Harv24

Private
Belligerents
Jan 23, 2014
142
66
34
Neenah,WI
bought a 1 piece EGW base and Seekins rings....no lapping...shoots great and passed box test and tall target.

Buy quality....no lapping required.
 

Greg Langelius *

Resident Elder Fart
Belligerents
Aug 10, 2001
5,872
1,130
219
Arizona, good place for me...
The solution to the rail on the 700 (or any other receiver whose absolutely precise dimensions you may doubt) is to bed the rail to the receiver. It's not hard and it goes a long way toward taming mechanical distortion in the mounting system.

Also, with a little ingenuity, one can actually use the bedding process to customize the rail slope, providing optimal elevation and windage to keep the image at the midrange of scope adjustment.

Greg
 

goosed

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
May 11, 2014
372
119
49
MN
If you really hate ring marks, a little rosin does a far better job of eliminating them than lapping.
 

ColinNSX

Private
Belligerents
Dec 4, 2010
31
10
12
34
Arizona
I've been buying USO, Loopy MkIV, and Nightforce rings and parking them on top of everything from CZ452's, up to Tactical Operations Tangos and Deltas. I've always bolted them down at the same time with a precision alignment bar, as well as very lightly lapped them. My reasoning behind putting in this extra effort has nothing to do with marks on a scope, but I've never had a scope get marked up while these methods. I've removed scopes and sold them with the buyer asking if it was ever mounted to a rifle at all.

Whether it's needed or not on high-end rings parked on a precise base is subjective and ultimately up to the end user. I do it, and will continue to do so even though I understand that fastener torque and the correct securement of the scope to the receiver is more important than a perfect alignment of the base. Eliminating a few tiny, tiny errors will result in no accumulation of error.